<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matt Hampel &#124; matth.org &#187; links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matth.org/category/links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matth.org</link>
	<description>I’m Matt Hampel, a digital developer and civic information hacker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Links: hyperlocal, sci-fi &amp; predictions, whack-a-mole</title>
		<link>http://matth.org/2008/06/10/links-hyperlocal-sci-fi-predictions-whack-a-mole/</link>
		<comments>http://matth.org/2008/06/10/links-hyperlocal-sci-fi-predictions-whack-a-mole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hampel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ivory tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recent changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matth.org/2008/06/10/links-hyperlocal-sci-fi-predictions-whack-a-mole/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Threads Adam Holland mentioned today that it&#8217;s getting harder to write predictive science fiction  because time between invention and adoption has decreased massively in the last 100 years. Dan Levy&#8217;s copy of the WSJ had an article on tracking migration patterns with cellphones. How many people = one phone? Whack-a-mole: a viable methodology for dealing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Threads</p>
<p>Adam Holland mentioned today that it&#8217;s getting harder to write predictive science fiction  because time between invention and adoption has <a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/03/blindsided_by_the_future.html">decreased massively</a> in the last 100 years.</p>
<p>Dan Levy&#8217;s copy of the WSJ had an article on <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121304382688758305.html">tracking migration patterns</a> with cellphones. How many people = one phone?</p>
<p>Whack-a-mole: a viable methodology for dealing with serious problems.</p>
<blockquote><p>Like many power companies in the area, Consolidated Edison played whack-a-mole to keep up with power failures, though it said it had plenty of slack capacity. (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/nyregion/10heat.html?hp">nyt</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Backyard Post is a city directory edited by&#8230; editors that are paid moneys. Not as automated as EveryBlock, not as text-heavy as ArborWiki. William Hartnett&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.jeffhaines.com/blog/?p=33#comment-120">glorified spreadsheet</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Alternative newspapers are being read by suburbia sez some (probably methodologically unsound) <a href="http://blogs.mediapost.com/research_brief/?p=1724">report</a>.</p>
<p>Rob Curley <a href="http://robcurley.com/2008/06/08/after-the-flop-flap-lessons-learned-from-loudoun/">responds</a> to a WSJ article on his &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121253859877343291.html">&#8216;Hyperlocal&#8217; flop</a>&#8221; &#8212; that geeks can and do know neighborhoods.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://roguecolumnist.typepad.com/rogue_columnist/2008/06/newspaper-suici.html">different response</a>: the failure is in the business model, not in real journalism. On the folly of local-local.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calderaro.caltech.edu/Personal%20Page/Main.html">Andrea Calderaro</a> of Caltech is using European and other demographic information to map the digital divide worldwide, the first such project. Follow up is asking how this will affect bottom-up political participation. All work is quantitative, based off survey  questions he didn&#8217;t write; he&#8217;s not actually asking people how they use technologies or investigating how they don&#8217;t. I wonder how much of the Real will be reflected in his report; excited to read it, in any case.</p>
<p><a href="Jettison everything but real reporting — which is a smaller proportion of an editorial budget than many would like to admit — and charge more for the product to a highly interested audience.">Big Pictures</a> from Boston.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://matth.org/2008/06/10/links-hyperlocal-sci-fi-predictions-whack-a-mole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

